1. hermanaresist:

    “Person of color” = someone discriminated against for their race/ethnicity on a systematic level by the white majority



    (Inspired by the commentary on this post)

    For the purposes of anti-racism struggles, that’s all you need to go by.

    Yes, the term, “colored” is not normally associated with Asian people these days, but it was definitely used to label people of Asian descent in this country in the past. We have been and still are the targets of White racism:




    Believing the fallacy that people of Asian descent are not authentically or legitimately ‘Colored’ or ‘People of Color’ is wrong because:

    1) It ignores the long history of racial discrimination and persecution of Asians in the U.S. (e.g. the Chinese Exclusion Acts, the Japanese-American internment during WWII, explicit campaigns to drive Asians out of the American West, the lynching of Asian Americans. (Which is something that is not commonly known due to the fact that many Asian and Mexican victims of mob violence in the 19th c. were classified as ‘White’ in official records*)


    2) It ignores the history of White European imperialism in Asian countries, which intersects with White racism against Asian immigrants in White-majority countries. I assure you that White imperialists certainly did not view Indians, Chinese, or Vietnamese as being anything other than ‘Colored’


    Imperial map of Asia, source of map

    European man receiving pedicure from South Asian servants

    White European man receiving a pedicure from South Asian servants

    3) It plays into the White racist divide-and-conquer strategy.

    Even a brief look at the history of race/ethnicity in U.S. law alone makes it apparent that a key aspect of White racism has been the classification of non-Whites according to (white-defined) categories.

    Those hailing from Asia (as well as the Middle East, the Caribbean, and Latin America) have been legally categorized in a myriad of ways—very occasionally as White, but more often as non-White (e.g. Ozawa v. United States, United States v. Thind). In general, Asians have occupied a strange ethno-racial limbo as ‘Other’ (e.g. the Census prior to 1870). As far as Whites were concerned, Asians might not have been ‘Negros’, but we certainly weren’t White either. Our otherness made us targets for discrimination and violence, and—because our right to citizenship has constantly come under attack—we’ve historically had as little recourse to the protection of the law as African Americans have.

    Massacre of the Chinese at Rock Springs, Wyoming

    Massacre of the Chinese at White Springs, Wyoming (source)

    Yes, Asian people have (somewhat more recently than you think) enjoyed certain perks due to our ethnicity/race compared to Black and AmerIndian people (e.g. ‘the model minority’). But that’s just a more recent aspect of the divide-and-conquer strategy, which the White hegemony has used to pit minorities against each other so as to distract us from the real problems facing our communities.

    And yes, some Asian people are complete racist dicks to those who aren’t Asian or White, but that’s internalized White racism. If you’ve been kicked and beaten by your master for years, then suddenly given a few scraps from his table, would you throw them in his face? Or is it more likely that—as beaten down as you are—you’d give in to Stockholm Syndrome and play along? (To be clear: that’s an explanation for Asian racism, not an excuse.)



    Even so, incidents of Anti-Asian bias (e.g. Vincent Chin, Wen Ho Lee) and straight-up racist violence occur frequently enough these days that Asians are hyper-aware of the fact that many—including non-whites—don’t view us as Americans, let alone ‘Colored’. We’re simply foreign ‘others’.

    So if White is grudgingly treating you OK, while Black and Brown seem to hate and distrust you, then whom do you ally yourself with? More importantly, who benefits from this apparent alliance?

    In the American black-white paradigm of race relations, ‘others’ like Asians get shit on no matter which side we’re on. So the Asian internalization of White racism makes a twisted kind of sense as a survival strategy, particularly if your natural allies (other victims of White racism) are treating you like foreigners and even equating you with the oppressor himself. 

    My point: Asians’ conflicted, sometimes tense, relations with African Americans and those who have been historically, categorically considered ‘Colored’ is an artifact of White racism. This means that if you exclude Asians from ‘Colored’ solidarity against White racism, you are reproducing a highly successful strategy of White racism.

    Let that sink in for a minute.


    To conclude: Anti-Asian exclusion from POC solidarity movements is ignorant, wrong, and just plain stupid. Asians’s current role as a prop of White racial supremacy is not our doing, just as our historic role as the foreign ‘Other’ is not our doing. The peculiar place of Asians in race relations today has been the result of the intersection of White racism, xenophobia, and imperialism. It is a mistake to think otherwise.  

    TL;DR: Questioning the identity of Asians as “people of color” reinforces White racial supremacy.

    ETA: There appears to be an uptick in hostility against Asians in these recent hard times. Last time there were major layoffs and bumps in the US economy, Vincent Chin got beaten to death. Unfortunately, I’m waiting for similar news to emerge from the current downturn. Even in so-called social justice circles, resentment of Asians under the umbrella of the model minority myth is often palpable. And this often comes from US Americans who have apparently shrugged off their own country’s racist invasions of the Philippines, Samoa, Hawaii, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Korea, the atomic bombs on Japan, the ongoing US military presence in Okinawa and the Korean peninsula, the ongoing occupation of Hawaii and Samoa. Two million Asians killed by US forces in Indochina and they think we don’t know oppression. It’s pretty amazing to hear people talk about how good Asians have it or how racist Asians are against this backdrop.

    (Source: downlo)

  2. amerikkkanstories:


    “So far, this is more a movement for dreamers than for middle-class Americans trying to make ends meet.”

    There’s a lot of valid points in the comments section of this article. This movement needs focus and goals, otherwise yeah…It’s one thing to protest but it’s another thing entirely to organize and have demands. Even the teabagging jerkoffs put people up to elect to push their bullshit agenda.

    I do not like the smug tone of some of the supporters saying that this thing is greater than x,y,z movement of the past. Bullshit. Get your shit together first.  

    And the presumption by (mostly) white folks that anything the do equals the precision and depth to which Tahir square was simply cause they say so is yelling

  3. writteninmysoul:

    Too Much Doubt To Execute!!

    Troy Davis was convicted of murdering a Georgia police officer in 1991. Nearly two decades later, Davis remains on death row — even though the case against him has fallen apart.

    The case against him consisted entirely of witness testimony which contained inconsistencies even at the time of the trial. Since then, all but two of the state’s non-police witnesses from the trial have recanted or contradicted their testimony.

    Many of these witnesses have stated in sworn affidavits that they were pressured or coerced by police into testifying or signing statements against Troy Davis.

    One of the two witnesses who has not recanted his testimony is Sylvester “Red” Coles — the principle alternative suspect, according to the defense, against whom there is new evidence implicating him as the gunman. Nine individuals have signed affidavits implicating Sylvester Coles.

    An execution date for Troy Davis is scheduled for September 21, 2011.

    (Source: porchmoth)